🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, campaigners, and families are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising number of nations are moving toward similar restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that phones and apps are "robbing our kids' youth". The policy is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban is "an measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked the legislature to enact a proposal raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged families to prevent their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a non-binding motion supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is provided. While it warns of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a solid first step," stated one MEP supporting the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "supported by robust data".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a young person who died after being exposed to harmful platform posts suggests that a simple age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to design tools that are safe and fit for minors," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, regulation is largely unfolding at the local government level amid national gridlock.

• Utah mandates parental consent for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a law prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has passed a regulation restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra use needing parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed bills mandating guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from certain individuals to follow this lead, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Apart from the West, further states are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, international agencies adopt a more cautious position. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even backfire". The body points out that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in safety.

As this worldwide discussion continues, the actions of this nation and others indicate that policymakers globally are less and less prepared to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.